Dr. Peter Rösmann

Lawyer and notary
Head office
Hamm
Dr. Peter Rösmann

Peter Rösmann is a lawyer, notary and a specialist banking and capital market lawyer.

He advises and represents banks, insurance companies and other financial service providers in all areas of banking and capital market law. His work extends to the interfaces between insolvency, insurance and corporate law. The focus of his work as a lawyer is on litigation. Within this context, he also develops cross-case defense strategies for class action suits. As a notary public, Peter Rösmann notarizes, inter alia, real estate and inheritance law matters.

He publishes and presents academic articles on banking law. He is a member of the Banking law Association - Academic Society for Banking law, and of the Foundation alumni association of the Sparkasse Financial Group. Before joining Grüter, Peter Rösmann was a partner in the law firm Streitbörger.

He speaks fluent English.

You can find the Privacy Policy of our Notaries here.

After training as a banker, Peter Rösmann studied law in Münster, with a focus on banking law. After passing his first state law exam in 2006, he obtained his doctorate under Prof. Dr. Matthias Casper in the field of banking law. He completed his legal clerkship at the Regional Court of Münster with practical stages in Windhoek (Namibia), Hamm and Düsseldorf in 2010 with passing his second state law exam. He was admitted to the bar in 2010. From 2014 until the end of 2023, he was Partner at law firm Streitbörger PartGmbB.

Heßlerstraße 40
59065 Hamm

Rösmann, Keine Verwirkung des Widerrufsrechts bei noch laufendem Darlehensvertrag (No forfeiture of the right of withdrawal if the loan agreement is still running), comment on OLG Frankfurt, judgment of 09.02.2022 - 17 U 52/21 (ZIP 2022, 889), EWiR 2022, 353;

Rösmann, Negativzins – Ausschluss durch AGB bei Altdarlehen – Unklarheitenregel (Negative interest - Exclusion by general terms and conditions for old loans - ambiguity rule), comment on OLG Düsseldorf, judgment of 28.10.2021 – I-5 U 29/21 (WM 2022,118), WuB 2022, 124;

Rösmann, Zur Missbräuchlichkeit einer Klausel in Verbrauchervertrag bei auf Fremdwährung lautendem Hypothekenkreditvertrag („Bank BPH“) (On the unfairness of a clause in a consumer contract in a mortgage loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency ("Bank BHP")), comment on ECJ, judgment of 29.04.2021 – C-19/20 (BB 2021, 1089), EWiR 2021, 577;

Rösmann, Verjährungshemmung für Anspruch auf Rückzahlung nach Gesamtfälligstellung des Teilzahlungsdarlehens wegen Zahlungsverzugs (Suspension of the statute of limitations for a claim for repayment after the installment loan has become due in full due to late payment), comment on BGH, judgment of 14.07.2020 – XI ZR 553/19 (ZIP 2020, 1803), EWiR 2020, 707;

Rösmann, Zur Reichweite der Gesetzlichkeitsfiktion des Musters für die Widerrufsbelehrung (On the scope of the legal fiction of the model for instruction on the right of revocation), comment on BGH, judgment of 26.11.2019 – XI ZR 307/18 (ZIP 2020,111), EWiR 2020,163;

Rösmann, Widerrufsbelehrung; Rechtsfolgenbelehrung im Fernabsatz; mehrere Darlehensnehmer als Mitgläubiger bereicherungsrechtlicher Ansprüche; Art. 4 Abs. 2 der Richtlinie 2002/65/EG als sekundärrechtlicher Öffnungsklausel für Schutzverstärkungen des nationalen Rechts (Right of cancellation; instructions on legal consequences of distance selling; several borrowers as co-creditors of enrichment claims; Art. 4 (2) of Directive 2002/65/EC as a secondary open clause to strengthen the protection of national law), comment on BGH, judgment of 03.07.2018 – XI ZR 520/16 (WM 2018, 1596), WuB 2018, 550;

Rösmann, Zur Berechnung der Vorfälligkeitsentschädigung bei außerordentlicher Kündigung eines gewerblichen Darlehensvertrags aufgrund Zahlungsverzugs (Calculating the early repayment fee in the event of extraordinary termination of a commercial loan agreement due to default in payment), comment on BGH, judgment of 20.02.2018 – XI ZR 445/17 (ZIP 2018, 821), EWiR 2018, 385;

Rösmann, Widerrufsbelehrung – Zusammenschau mit Zusätzen außerhalb der Widerrufsbelehrung – Verwirkung (Instructions on revocation - summary with additions outside the instructions - forfeiture), comment on BGH 10.10.2017 - XI ZR 443/16 (WM 2017, 2248), WuB 2018, 117;

Rösmann, Unzulässigkeit einer Kündigungsklausel in Allgemeinen Bedingungen für Bausparverträge (Inadmissibility of a termination clause in general terms and conditions for building society savings contracts), comment on LG Karlsruhe 01.01.2017 - 10 O 509/16 (WM 2017, 2064), WuB 2018, 81;

Rösmann, Darstellung von Weichkosten im Prospekt (Presentation of soft costs in prospectuses), comment on BGH, judgment of 21.06.2016 - II ZR 331/14 (WM 2016, 1487), WuB 2016, 682;

Rösmann/Heide, Die Kick-Back-Rechtsprechung des BGH aus der Sicht der Praxis (The kick-back rulings of the Federal Supreme Court from a practical perspective), AD LEGENDUM 2013, 8 et seqq.;

Batereau/Rösmann, Comment on OLG Munich WM 2012, 1536 (5 U 2167/11), WuB IV F. 1.12;

Rösmann, Kontrahierungspflichten der Kreditwirtschaft aufgrund von Selbstverpflichtungen und § 21 AGG (Contractual obligations of the banking industry based on voluntary commitments and Section 21 of the General Act on Equal Treatment), Frankfurt am Main, 2009.